Vol 95, 2020 Vol 94, 2019 Vol 93, 2018 Vol 92, 2017 Vol 91, 2016 Vol 90, 2015 Vol 89, 2014 Vol 88, 2013 Vol 87, 2012 Vol 86, 2011 Vol 85, 2009-2010 Vol 84, 2008-2009 Vol 83, 2007-2008 Vol 82, 2006-2007 Vol 81, 2005-2006 Vol 80, 2004-2005 Vol 79, 2003-2004 Volume 78, 2002-2003 Vol 77, 2001-2002 Vol 76, 2000-2001 Vol 75, 1999-2000 Vol 74, 1998. Originally published in 1984, the articles presented here explore such matters as how teachers maintain order, how they treat their pupils and how they cope with pressure; they examine the ways in which teachers relate to their colleagues, what goes on in staffrooms, how they engage in educational debate, and what their ambitions are.
This article reports selected results of a study in which teachers’ perceptions, opinions, and attitudes about instructional computing were examined. Implications about equitable access to computers in public schools are described. The data were gathered via a questionnaire mailed to 510 sixth-grade teachers in K-6 structured public schools. Significant findings concerning the nature of teachers’ thoughts and experiences with instructional computing, and the potential effect of those factors on students’ access to computers, are reported. As a needs assessment, this study provides useful information to instructional designers about how teachers perceive the computer and its use in their classrooms. Based upon the study, factors to consider when designing computer-based instruction for implementation in schools are suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Alvarado, A. J. (1984, April). Computer education for all students.The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 14–15.
Anderson, R. E., Welch, W. W., & Harris, L. J. (1984, April). Inequities in opportunities for computer literacy.The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 10–12.
Becker, H. J. (1982, January).Microcomputers in the classroom—dreams and realities. Baltimore, Maryland: Center for Social Organization of Schools, John Hopkins University.
Becker, H. J. (1984, Spring). School uses of microcomputers. Report #3 from a national survey.The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, III(3), 26–32.
Becker, H. J. (1985, July).The second national U.S. school uses of microcomputers survey. Paper presented at the World Conference on Computers in Education, Norfolk, Virginia.
Becker, H. J. (1986a, June).Instructional uses of school computers. Reports from the 1985 national survey. Issue number 1. Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University.
Becker, H. J. (1986b, August).Instructional uses of school computers. Reports from the 1985 national survey. Issue Number 2. Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1976). Implementation of educational innovation.Educational Forum, 40(3), 345–370.
Cuban, L. (1986).Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Dalton, D., & Hannafin, M. (1986). The effects of video-only, CAI only, and interactive video instructional systems on learner performance and attitude: An exploratory study.Proceedings of the Annual Convention for the Association of Educational Communications and Technology in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Edwards, C. (1984, April). Achieving equity.The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 62–64.
Enochs, L. G. (1984, Spring). The effect of computer instruction on general attitudes toward computers of fifth graders.The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, III(3), 24–25.
Fullan, M. (1982).The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design.Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3).
Lacina, L. J. (1984, Winter). Computer equity in public education.Education, 104(2), 128–130.
Marrapodi, M. R. (1984, April). Females and computers? Absolutely!The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 57–58.
Sarason, S. B. (1982).The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Schiffman, S. S. (1987). Influencing public education: A “window of opportunity” through school library media centers.Journal of Instructional Development, 10(4).
Schubert, J. G., & Bakke, T. W. (1984, April). Practical solutions to overcoming inequity in computer use.The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 28–30.
Sheingold, K., Kane, J., Endreweit, M., & Billings, K. (1981, February).Issues related to the implementation of computer technology in schools: A cross-sectional study. New York: Bank Street College of Education.
Refreshing the Icon Cache Quickly Using the IE Per-User Initialization Utility (IE4Uinit.exe), you can quickly refresh the shell icons. Press WinKey + R to bring up the Run. On Windows 10, those icons you see on files and apps are stored in the icon cache database to allow the operating system to display them quickly on the screen. The process of caching icons, instead of retrieving them from the source, helps to prevent your system from getting bogged down by the mere task of 'showing icons'. Reset icon cache 3utoolsgeekstree.
Shrock, S. A., & Byrd, D. M. (1987). An instructional development look at staff development in the public schools.Journal of Instructional Development, 10(4).
Weinshank, A. B., Trumbull, E. S., & Daly, P. L. (1983). The role of the teacher in school change. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.),Handbook of teaching and policy. New York: Longman.
Correspondence to Nancy Nelson Knupfer.
1984 News Articles Updatemr. Becker's Classroom Assessment
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knupfer, N.N. Teachers’ beliefs about instructional computing: Implications for instructional designers. Journal of Instructional Development11, 29–38 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905302
1984 News Articles Updatemr. Becker's Classroom Environment
- Preservice Teacher
- Instructional Designer
- Teacher Training
- Inservice Training
- Instructional Development